<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FNH FNAC (FN Advanced Carbine)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recoilweb.com/fnh-fnac-fn-advanced-carbine-255.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recoilweb.com/fnh-fnac-fn-advanced-carbine-255.html</link>
	<description>The Ultimate Gun Lifestyle Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 19:58:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John M</title>
		<link>http://www.recoilweb.com/fnh-fnac-fn-advanced-carbine-255.html/comment-page-1/#comment-20595</link>
		<dc:creator>John M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2013 04:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recoilweb.com/?p=255#comment-20595</guid>
		<description>I believe the departure of using the reciprocating charging handle and relocation of the fixed front sight to the rail is a &quot;win-win&quot;. Shortening the barrel just makes more sense as well. 

On a technical clarification -- the operating systems of the G3 and the SCAR are so NOT related you might as well be comparing apples to chain saws. HK&#039;s delayed roller vs FN&#039;s short stroke piston system are worlds apart functionally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the departure of using the reciprocating charging handle and relocation of the fixed front sight to the rail is a &#8220;win-win&#8221;. Shortening the barrel just makes more sense as well. </p>
<p>On a technical clarification &#8212; the operating systems of the G3 and the SCAR are so NOT related you might as well be comparing apples to chain saws. HK&#8217;s delayed roller vs FN&#8217;s short stroke piston system are worlds apart functionally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew Lengyel</title>
		<link>http://www.recoilweb.com/fnh-fnac-fn-advanced-carbine-255.html/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew Lengyel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 02:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recoilweb.com/?p=255#comment-559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve fired both the SCAR-L and the SCAR-H.  Great weapons; both of them are very well balanced when you hold them while aiming down the sight.  I feel like both of these weapons are a shortened and lightened version of the G3 using a new chamber but ultimately the same exact firing mechanism.  When you fire the SCAR&#039;s and compare them to the G3, they feel almost exactly the same.  What isn&#039;t the same is price.  You can pick up a G3 for less than half the price a SCAR would cost you.  I would also point out that you can buy shortened barrels and conversion kits to make the G3 less bulky.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve fired both the SCAR-L and the SCAR-H.  Great weapons; both of them are very well balanced when you hold them while aiming down the sight.  I feel like both of these weapons are a shortened and lightened version of the G3 using a new chamber but ultimately the same exact firing mechanism.  When you fire the SCAR&#8217;s and compare them to the G3, they feel almost exactly the same.  What isn&#8217;t the same is price.  You can pick up a G3 for less than half the price a SCAR would cost you.  I would also point out that you can buy shortened barrels and conversion kits to make the G3 less bulky.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>