Defense US Palm and Armor Express: Body Armor self test David Reeder September 27, 2013 Join the Conversation US Palm recently posted this video. Watch it and then we'll cover some details. That is Matt Davis of Armor Express. He is demonstrating his confidence in the ballistic capabilities of the Level IIIA panels Armor Express provides to US Palm (a Scottsdale, AZ based manufacturer of excellent loadbearing gear, AK magazines and other gear). It was, according to US Palm, a panel picked randomly from their inventory (US Palm uses Armor Express panels exclusively). Armor Express is, FYI, the manufacturer of the body armor that saved Oak Creek Police Department Lt. Brian Murphy when he responded to the active shooter murders at the Sikh Temple in Wisconsin last year. It's not the first time he's shot at himself to demonstrate the quality of the armor built by this family-owned business. Remember this video? Go to 00:36. Watch the (completely understandable) reaction of his father. To say this implies a high level of confidence in the product is a gross understatement. As you can imagine, controversy over whether Mr. Davis should or should not have done this (and US Palm made it public) has been significant, which is a little surprising. It's by no means the first time he's done it. Comparisons have been made to placing live photographers downrange during live fire training, though personally I believe that's a case of comparing apples to oranges. Statements have ranged from ‘You can't fix stupid‘ to ‘How's he walkin' around with a bucket of balls like that?' It's not the first time brave, confident and/or arguably foolish men have volunteered to test body armor. I remember as a rookie in the 90s, hearing about Richard Davis (Second Chance body armor) shooting himself in the chest with pistols provided by local police agencies. Going further back, there are pictures of NYPD officers in the 20s allowing other officers to shoot them within just a meter or two for similar demonstrative purposes. There are those who would argue the sort of demonstration Matt made was unnecessary, with undue risk. Others would say it's commendable; he asks others to trust their lives in his product, why shouldn't he? Personally I find it reassuring and convincing as hell. Your thoughts? Explore RECOILweb:Is the XM17 Going to Happen?2014 Jeep Rubicon - Green BarageRemington recalling Model 700s and Model 7s with X-Mark ProsReview - Mystic Precision MPOD NEXT STEP: Download Your Free Target Pack from RECOILFor years, RECOIL magazine has treated its readers to a full-size (sometimes full color!) shooting target tucked into each big issue. Now we've compiled over 50 of our most popular targets into this one digital PDF download. From handgun drills to AR-15 practice, these 50+ targets have you covered. Print off as many as you like (ammo not included). Get your pack of 50 Print-at-Home targets when you subscribe to the RECOIL email newsletter. We'll send you weekly updates on guns, gear, industry news, and special offers from leading manufacturers - your guide to the firearms lifestyle.You want this. Trust Us.